The Best 5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Forcepoint ONE is a cloud-native security platform designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces. It offers secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, continuous control over data, and identity-based access control on any device. The platform empowers faster and safer work from anywhere, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles.
Forcepoint ONE Pricing
Specific pricing information for Forcepoint ONE isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit Forcepoint's website to request a demo or contact their sales team for more details on pricing and plans.
Forcepoint ONE's Reviews
Users of Forcepoint ONE have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. Overall, Forcepoint ONE has received a rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars. Some key feedback points from users include ease of use, effective security features, and reliable performance. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Forcepoint ONE, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE
1. Lacework
Lacework is an AI-powered cloud security platform designed to reduce risks and stop threats in cloud environments. It offers a unified CNAPP for developers and security teams, enabling collaboration and accelerated work. With user-friendly features and scalability, Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Lacework Pricing
Lacework offers two pricing plans, Pro and Enterprise, with personalized pricing quotes available upon request. Visit the Lacework Pricing page for more information.
Lacework Reviews
Users of Lacework have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Lacework, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Lacework
Cloud Security Compliance: Lacework automates compliance checks, ensuring adherence to industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR in cloud environments.
Container Security: Lacework provides visibility and threat detection for containerized applications, safeguarding against vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
DevOps Security: Lacework integrates with CI/CD pipelines, enabling security teams and developers to collaborate on securing cloud-native applications.
3 Pros and Cons of Lacework
Pros:
AI-powered threat detection: Lacework's platform uses artificial intelligence to identify and respond to security threats in real-time.
Unified CNAPP: The platform offers a single solution for cloud, container, and DevOps security, simplifying management and collaboration.
Compliance automation: Lacework automates compliance checks for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR, reducing manual efforts and risks.
Cons:
Learning curve: Some users on G2 mention that Lacework's platform can be complex, requiring time to learn and adapt to its features.
Integration limitations: While Lacework integrates with many popular tools, users may encounter challenges with less common or custom applications.
Cost: Lacework's pricing may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets, as personalized quotes are required for both Pro and Enterprise plans.
Lacework compared to Forcepoint ONE
Comparing Forcepoint ONE and Lacework, the following specific qualities separate them from each other:
Access and Infrastructure: Forcepoint ONE focuses on secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles, while Lacework is designed for cloud security in DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Security Features: Forcepoint ONE offers identity-based access control and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Lacework provides AI-powered threat detection, unified CNAPP, and compliance automation for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
2. Orca Security
Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) designed to provide comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks, including misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identity risks, data security, API exposure, and advanced threats. The platform is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
Orca Security Pricing
Orca Security's pricing information is not publicly available. To learn more, you can schedule a personalized demo on their website.
Orca Security Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Orca Security, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Orca Security customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Orca Security
Full-Stack Visibility: Orca Security provides comprehensive coverage of your entire cloud environment, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data.
Agentless Deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, enabling seamless integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-Cloud Security: Orca supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, ensuring consistent security and compliance across diverse cloud platforms.
3 Pros and Cons of Orca Security
Pros:
Comprehensive coverage: Orca Security offers full-stack visibility, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data in multi-cloud environments.
Agentless deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, simplifying integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-cloud support: Orca ensures consistent security and compliance across AWS, Azure, and GCP, catering to diverse cloud platforms.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Orca Security does not provide public pricing information, requiring potential customers to schedule a demo for details.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Orca's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Orca supports major cloud platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Orca Security compared to Forcepoint ONE
Focus and Features: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) providing comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks in multi-cloud environments.
Deployment and Integration: Forcepoint ONE replaces aging infrastructure and adopts Zero Trust principles, whereas Orca Security uses agentless deployment with its SideScanning™ technology, enabling seamless integration and reduced maintenance efforts.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Orca Security is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
3. Tenable
Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform designed to help organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks. With an analytics-led approach, Tenable offers a fully integrated cloud-based solution that simplifies IT security while providing visibility across the entire attack surface. Suitable for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale, Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution.
Tenable Pricing
Tenable offers various pricing plans, including Tenable Nessus Professional, starting at $3,990 per year. For more information, visit the Tenable Pricing page.
Tenable Reviews
Users of Tenable have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Tenable, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Tenable
Vulnerability Management: Tenable identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations remediate risks and strengthen their security posture.
Asset Visibility: Tenable provides comprehensive asset discovery, ensuring complete visibility and control over your IT environment.
Compliance Monitoring: Tenable automates compliance checks, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements.
3 Pros and Cons of Tenable
Pros:
Comprehensive vulnerability management: Tenable effectively identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations strengthen their security posture.
Complete asset visibility: Tenable's asset discovery ensures full visibility and control over IT environments, reducing blind spots.
Automated compliance monitoring: Tenable streamlines adherence to industry standards and regulations by automating compliance checks.
Cons:
Complex interface: Some users on G2 find Tenable's interface challenging to navigate, impacting user experience.
Initial setup: Tenable may require time and effort for initial setup and configuration, potentially delaying deployment.
Cost: Tenable's pricing, starting at $3,990 per year, may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
Tenable compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform that helps organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks across their entire attack surface.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Tenable offers vulnerability management, asset visibility, and compliance monitoring for various industry standards and regulations.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale.
4. Snyk
Snyk is a developer security platform that integrates seamlessly into development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, helping developers find and fix vulnerabilities in their code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Snyk aims to provide a secure and maintainable solution for developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes.
Snyk Pricing
Snyk offers pricing plans for various needs, including a free plan for individual developers and small teams, a Team plan starting at $25 per month/product, and an Enterprise plan with customizable options. Visit Snyk Pricing for more details.
Snyk Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Snyk, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Snyk
Open Source Dependency Security: Snyk identifies and fixes vulnerabilities in open source libraries, ensuring secure and up-to-date dependencies in your projects.
Container Image Scanning: Snyk scans container images for vulnerabilities, helping developers build and deploy secure containerized applications.
Infrastructure as Code Security: Snyk analyzes infrastructure as code (IaC) configurations, detecting and remediating misconfigurations to prevent security risks.
3 Pros and Cons of Snyk
Pros:
Seamless integration: Snyk easily integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, streamlining vulnerability detection and remediation.
Comprehensive security coverage: Snyk covers open source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure as code, providing a holistic security solution for developers.
User-friendly platform: Snyk's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
False positives: Some users on G2 report occasional false positives, requiring manual verification and adjustment.
Performance impact: Snyk's scanning process may slow down build times, potentially affecting development workflows and productivity.
Cost for larger teams: While Snyk offers a free plan for individuals and small teams, larger organizations may find the pricing for advanced features and support less budget-friendly.
Snyk compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Snyk is a developer security platform that helps developers find and fix vulnerabilities in code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code.
Integration: Forcepoint ONE modernizes access with SASE and FlexEdge Secure SD-WAN, adopting Zero Trust principles and offering consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Snyk seamlessly integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines for streamlined vulnerability detection and remediation.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Snyk caters to developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes seeking a secure and maintainable solution for their applications.
5. Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform designed to secure applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features for businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure.
Prisma Cloud Pricing
Prisma Cloud's pricing is based on a credit model and cloud security module bundles. Specific plan names and costs are not provided on the website. For more information, refer to the Prisma Cloud Enterprise Edition Credit Guide.
Prisma Cloud Reviews
Users of Prisma Cloud have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Prisma Cloud, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Prisma Cloud
Cloud Security Posture Management: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, ensuring compliance and reducing risks in cloud environments.
Container and Kubernetes Security: Prisma Cloud secures containerized applications, detecting vulnerabilities and protecting against threats in Kubernetes deployments.
Serverless Function Security: Prisma Cloud safeguards serverless functions, monitoring and defending against potential attacks and vulnerabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Prisma Cloud
Pros:
Comprehensive security coverage: Prisma Cloud offers end-to-end protection for cloud environments, containerized applications, and serverless functions, ensuring a robust security posture.
Automated compliance checks: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements in cloud environments.
User-friendly platform: Prisma Cloud's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Prisma Cloud's credit-based pricing model and module bundles may be confusing for potential customers, requiring further research or consultation.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Prisma Cloud's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Prisma Cloud supports many popular tools and platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Prisma Cloud compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform that secures applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features such as Code Security, Infrastructure Security, Runtime Security, and AI Security Posture Management.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Prisma Cloud caters to businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure throughout the entire application lifecycle.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By embracing the modern work landscape, Twingate empowers organizations to maintain secure access, enhance productivity, and reduce risks.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Forcepoint ONE is a cloud-native security platform designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces. It offers secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, continuous control over data, and identity-based access control on any device. The platform empowers faster and safer work from anywhere, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles.
Forcepoint ONE Pricing
Specific pricing information for Forcepoint ONE isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit Forcepoint's website to request a demo or contact their sales team for more details on pricing and plans.
Forcepoint ONE's Reviews
Users of Forcepoint ONE have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. Overall, Forcepoint ONE has received a rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars. Some key feedback points from users include ease of use, effective security features, and reliable performance. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Forcepoint ONE, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE
1. Lacework
Lacework is an AI-powered cloud security platform designed to reduce risks and stop threats in cloud environments. It offers a unified CNAPP for developers and security teams, enabling collaboration and accelerated work. With user-friendly features and scalability, Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Lacework Pricing
Lacework offers two pricing plans, Pro and Enterprise, with personalized pricing quotes available upon request. Visit the Lacework Pricing page for more information.
Lacework Reviews
Users of Lacework have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Lacework, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Lacework
Cloud Security Compliance: Lacework automates compliance checks, ensuring adherence to industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR in cloud environments.
Container Security: Lacework provides visibility and threat detection for containerized applications, safeguarding against vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
DevOps Security: Lacework integrates with CI/CD pipelines, enabling security teams and developers to collaborate on securing cloud-native applications.
3 Pros and Cons of Lacework
Pros:
AI-powered threat detection: Lacework's platform uses artificial intelligence to identify and respond to security threats in real-time.
Unified CNAPP: The platform offers a single solution for cloud, container, and DevOps security, simplifying management and collaboration.
Compliance automation: Lacework automates compliance checks for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR, reducing manual efforts and risks.
Cons:
Learning curve: Some users on G2 mention that Lacework's platform can be complex, requiring time to learn and adapt to its features.
Integration limitations: While Lacework integrates with many popular tools, users may encounter challenges with less common or custom applications.
Cost: Lacework's pricing may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets, as personalized quotes are required for both Pro and Enterprise plans.
Lacework compared to Forcepoint ONE
Comparing Forcepoint ONE and Lacework, the following specific qualities separate them from each other:
Access and Infrastructure: Forcepoint ONE focuses on secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles, while Lacework is designed for cloud security in DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Security Features: Forcepoint ONE offers identity-based access control and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Lacework provides AI-powered threat detection, unified CNAPP, and compliance automation for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
2. Orca Security
Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) designed to provide comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks, including misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identity risks, data security, API exposure, and advanced threats. The platform is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
Orca Security Pricing
Orca Security's pricing information is not publicly available. To learn more, you can schedule a personalized demo on their website.
Orca Security Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Orca Security, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Orca Security customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Orca Security
Full-Stack Visibility: Orca Security provides comprehensive coverage of your entire cloud environment, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data.
Agentless Deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, enabling seamless integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-Cloud Security: Orca supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, ensuring consistent security and compliance across diverse cloud platforms.
3 Pros and Cons of Orca Security
Pros:
Comprehensive coverage: Orca Security offers full-stack visibility, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data in multi-cloud environments.
Agentless deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, simplifying integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-cloud support: Orca ensures consistent security and compliance across AWS, Azure, and GCP, catering to diverse cloud platforms.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Orca Security does not provide public pricing information, requiring potential customers to schedule a demo for details.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Orca's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Orca supports major cloud platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Orca Security compared to Forcepoint ONE
Focus and Features: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) providing comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks in multi-cloud environments.
Deployment and Integration: Forcepoint ONE replaces aging infrastructure and adopts Zero Trust principles, whereas Orca Security uses agentless deployment with its SideScanning™ technology, enabling seamless integration and reduced maintenance efforts.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Orca Security is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
3. Tenable
Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform designed to help organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks. With an analytics-led approach, Tenable offers a fully integrated cloud-based solution that simplifies IT security while providing visibility across the entire attack surface. Suitable for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale, Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution.
Tenable Pricing
Tenable offers various pricing plans, including Tenable Nessus Professional, starting at $3,990 per year. For more information, visit the Tenable Pricing page.
Tenable Reviews
Users of Tenable have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Tenable, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Tenable
Vulnerability Management: Tenable identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations remediate risks and strengthen their security posture.
Asset Visibility: Tenable provides comprehensive asset discovery, ensuring complete visibility and control over your IT environment.
Compliance Monitoring: Tenable automates compliance checks, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements.
3 Pros and Cons of Tenable
Pros:
Comprehensive vulnerability management: Tenable effectively identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations strengthen their security posture.
Complete asset visibility: Tenable's asset discovery ensures full visibility and control over IT environments, reducing blind spots.
Automated compliance monitoring: Tenable streamlines adherence to industry standards and regulations by automating compliance checks.
Cons:
Complex interface: Some users on G2 find Tenable's interface challenging to navigate, impacting user experience.
Initial setup: Tenable may require time and effort for initial setup and configuration, potentially delaying deployment.
Cost: Tenable's pricing, starting at $3,990 per year, may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
Tenable compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform that helps organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks across their entire attack surface.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Tenable offers vulnerability management, asset visibility, and compliance monitoring for various industry standards and regulations.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale.
4. Snyk
Snyk is a developer security platform that integrates seamlessly into development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, helping developers find and fix vulnerabilities in their code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Snyk aims to provide a secure and maintainable solution for developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes.
Snyk Pricing
Snyk offers pricing plans for various needs, including a free plan for individual developers and small teams, a Team plan starting at $25 per month/product, and an Enterprise plan with customizable options. Visit Snyk Pricing for more details.
Snyk Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Snyk, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Snyk
Open Source Dependency Security: Snyk identifies and fixes vulnerabilities in open source libraries, ensuring secure and up-to-date dependencies in your projects.
Container Image Scanning: Snyk scans container images for vulnerabilities, helping developers build and deploy secure containerized applications.
Infrastructure as Code Security: Snyk analyzes infrastructure as code (IaC) configurations, detecting and remediating misconfigurations to prevent security risks.
3 Pros and Cons of Snyk
Pros:
Seamless integration: Snyk easily integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, streamlining vulnerability detection and remediation.
Comprehensive security coverage: Snyk covers open source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure as code, providing a holistic security solution for developers.
User-friendly platform: Snyk's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
False positives: Some users on G2 report occasional false positives, requiring manual verification and adjustment.
Performance impact: Snyk's scanning process may slow down build times, potentially affecting development workflows and productivity.
Cost for larger teams: While Snyk offers a free plan for individuals and small teams, larger organizations may find the pricing for advanced features and support less budget-friendly.
Snyk compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Snyk is a developer security platform that helps developers find and fix vulnerabilities in code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code.
Integration: Forcepoint ONE modernizes access with SASE and FlexEdge Secure SD-WAN, adopting Zero Trust principles and offering consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Snyk seamlessly integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines for streamlined vulnerability detection and remediation.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Snyk caters to developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes seeking a secure and maintainable solution for their applications.
5. Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform designed to secure applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features for businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure.
Prisma Cloud Pricing
Prisma Cloud's pricing is based on a credit model and cloud security module bundles. Specific plan names and costs are not provided on the website. For more information, refer to the Prisma Cloud Enterprise Edition Credit Guide.
Prisma Cloud Reviews
Users of Prisma Cloud have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Prisma Cloud, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Prisma Cloud
Cloud Security Posture Management: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, ensuring compliance and reducing risks in cloud environments.
Container and Kubernetes Security: Prisma Cloud secures containerized applications, detecting vulnerabilities and protecting against threats in Kubernetes deployments.
Serverless Function Security: Prisma Cloud safeguards serverless functions, monitoring and defending against potential attacks and vulnerabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Prisma Cloud
Pros:
Comprehensive security coverage: Prisma Cloud offers end-to-end protection for cloud environments, containerized applications, and serverless functions, ensuring a robust security posture.
Automated compliance checks: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements in cloud environments.
User-friendly platform: Prisma Cloud's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Prisma Cloud's credit-based pricing model and module bundles may be confusing for potential customers, requiring further research or consultation.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Prisma Cloud's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Prisma Cloud supports many popular tools and platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Prisma Cloud compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform that secures applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features such as Code Security, Infrastructure Security, Runtime Security, and AI Security Posture Management.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Prisma Cloud caters to businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure throughout the entire application lifecycle.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By embracing the modern work landscape, Twingate empowers organizations to maintain secure access, enhance productivity, and reduce risks.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Forcepoint ONE is a cloud-native security platform designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces. It offers secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, continuous control over data, and identity-based access control on any device. The platform empowers faster and safer work from anywhere, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles.
Forcepoint ONE Pricing
Specific pricing information for Forcepoint ONE isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit Forcepoint's website to request a demo or contact their sales team for more details on pricing and plans.
Forcepoint ONE's Reviews
Users of Forcepoint ONE have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. Overall, Forcepoint ONE has received a rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars. Some key feedback points from users include ease of use, effective security features, and reliable performance. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Forcepoint ONE, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
5 Alternatives to Forcepoint ONE
1. Lacework
Lacework is an AI-powered cloud security platform designed to reduce risks and stop threats in cloud environments. It offers a unified CNAPP for developers and security teams, enabling collaboration and accelerated work. With user-friendly features and scalability, Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Lacework Pricing
Lacework offers two pricing plans, Pro and Enterprise, with personalized pricing quotes available upon request. Visit the Lacework Pricing page for more information.
Lacework Reviews
Users of Lacework have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Lacework, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Lacework
Cloud Security Compliance: Lacework automates compliance checks, ensuring adherence to industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR in cloud environments.
Container Security: Lacework provides visibility and threat detection for containerized applications, safeguarding against vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
DevOps Security: Lacework integrates with CI/CD pipelines, enabling security teams and developers to collaborate on securing cloud-native applications.
3 Pros and Cons of Lacework
Pros:
AI-powered threat detection: Lacework's platform uses artificial intelligence to identify and respond to security threats in real-time.
Unified CNAPP: The platform offers a single solution for cloud, container, and DevOps security, simplifying management and collaboration.
Compliance automation: Lacework automates compliance checks for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR, reducing manual efforts and risks.
Cons:
Learning curve: Some users on G2 mention that Lacework's platform can be complex, requiring time to learn and adapt to its features.
Integration limitations: While Lacework integrates with many popular tools, users may encounter challenges with less common or custom applications.
Cost: Lacework's pricing may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets, as personalized quotes are required for both Pro and Enterprise plans.
Lacework compared to Forcepoint ONE
Comparing Forcepoint ONE and Lacework, the following specific qualities separate them from each other:
Access and Infrastructure: Forcepoint ONE focuses on secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, replacing aging infrastructure and adopting Zero Trust principles, while Lacework is designed for cloud security in DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
Security Features: Forcepoint ONE offers identity-based access control and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Lacework provides AI-powered threat detection, unified CNAPP, and compliance automation for industry standards like PCI, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Lacework is suitable for organizations requiring cloud security solutions for their DevOps, containers, and cloud environments.
2. Orca Security
Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) designed to provide comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks, including misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identity risks, data security, API exposure, and advanced threats. The platform is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
Orca Security Pricing
Orca Security's pricing information is not publicly available. To learn more, you can schedule a personalized demo on their website.
Orca Security Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Orca Security, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Orca Security customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Orca Security
Full-Stack Visibility: Orca Security provides comprehensive coverage of your entire cloud environment, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data.
Agentless Deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, enabling seamless integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-Cloud Security: Orca supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, ensuring consistent security and compliance across diverse cloud platforms.
3 Pros and Cons of Orca Security
Pros:
Comprehensive coverage: Orca Security offers full-stack visibility, detecting risks across infrastructure, applications, and data in multi-cloud environments.
Agentless deployment: Orca's SideScanning™ technology eliminates the need for agents, simplifying integration and reducing maintenance efforts.
Multi-cloud support: Orca ensures consistent security and compliance across AWS, Azure, and GCP, catering to diverse cloud platforms.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Orca Security does not provide public pricing information, requiring potential customers to schedule a demo for details.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Orca's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Orca supports major cloud platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Orca Security compared to Forcepoint ONE
Focus and Features: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Orca Security is a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) providing comprehensive coverage across all cloud risks in multi-cloud environments.
Deployment and Integration: Forcepoint ONE replaces aging infrastructure and adopts Zero Trust principles, whereas Orca Security uses agentless deployment with its SideScanning™ technology, enabling seamless integration and reduced maintenance efforts.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Orca Security is suitable for organizations requiring robust cloud security solutions for their multi-cloud environments at scale.
3. Tenable
Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform designed to help organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks. With an analytics-led approach, Tenable offers a fully integrated cloud-based solution that simplifies IT security while providing visibility across the entire attack surface. Suitable for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale, Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution.
Tenable Pricing
Tenable offers various pricing plans, including Tenable Nessus Professional, starting at $3,990 per year. For more information, visit the Tenable Pricing page.
Tenable Reviews
Users of Tenable have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Tenable, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Tenable
Vulnerability Management: Tenable identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations remediate risks and strengthen their security posture.
Asset Visibility: Tenable provides comprehensive asset discovery, ensuring complete visibility and control over your IT environment.
Compliance Monitoring: Tenable automates compliance checks, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements.
3 Pros and Cons of Tenable
Pros:
Comprehensive vulnerability management: Tenable effectively identifies and prioritizes vulnerabilities, helping organizations strengthen their security posture.
Complete asset visibility: Tenable's asset discovery ensures full visibility and control over IT environments, reducing blind spots.
Automated compliance monitoring: Tenable streamlines adherence to industry standards and regulations by automating compliance checks.
Cons:
Complex interface: Some users on G2 find Tenable's interface challenging to navigate, impacting user experience.
Initial setup: Tenable may require time and effort for initial setup and configuration, potentially delaying deployment.
Cost: Tenable's pricing, starting at $3,990 per year, may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
Tenable compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE is designed to simplify security for hybrid workforces, offering secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Tenable is a cyber exposure management platform that helps organizations proactively identify and address cyber risks across their entire attack surface.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Tenable offers vulnerability management, asset visibility, and compliance monitoring for various industry standards and regulations.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Tenable caters to organizations seeking a user-friendly and scalable security solution for managing complex multi-cloud environments and enforcing least privilege at scale.
4. Snyk
Snyk is a developer security platform that integrates seamlessly into development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, helping developers find and fix vulnerabilities in their code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Snyk aims to provide a secure and maintainable solution for developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes.
Snyk Pricing
Snyk offers pricing plans for various needs, including a free plan for individual developers and small teams, a Team plan starting at $25 per month/product, and an Enterprise plan with customizable options. Visit Snyk Pricing for more details.
Snyk Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Snyk, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Snyk
Open Source Dependency Security: Snyk identifies and fixes vulnerabilities in open source libraries, ensuring secure and up-to-date dependencies in your projects.
Container Image Scanning: Snyk scans container images for vulnerabilities, helping developers build and deploy secure containerized applications.
Infrastructure as Code Security: Snyk analyzes infrastructure as code (IaC) configurations, detecting and remediating misconfigurations to prevent security risks.
3 Pros and Cons of Snyk
Pros:
Seamless integration: Snyk easily integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines, streamlining vulnerability detection and remediation.
Comprehensive security coverage: Snyk covers open source dependencies, container images, and infrastructure as code, providing a holistic security solution for developers.
User-friendly platform: Snyk's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
False positives: Some users on G2 report occasional false positives, requiring manual verification and adjustment.
Performance impact: Snyk's scanning process may slow down build times, potentially affecting development workflows and productivity.
Cost for larger teams: While Snyk offers a free plan for individuals and small teams, larger organizations may find the pricing for advanced features and support less budget-friendly.
Snyk compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Snyk is a developer security platform that helps developers find and fix vulnerabilities in code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code.
Integration: Forcepoint ONE modernizes access with SASE and FlexEdge Secure SD-WAN, adopting Zero Trust principles and offering consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Snyk seamlessly integrates with development tools, workflows, and automation pipelines for streamlined vulnerability detection and remediation.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Snyk caters to developers, development teams, and organizations of all sizes seeking a secure and maintainable solution for their applications.
5. Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform designed to secure applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features for businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure.
Prisma Cloud Pricing
Prisma Cloud's pricing is based on a credit model and cloud security module bundles. Specific plan names and costs are not provided on the website. For more information, refer to the Prisma Cloud Enterprise Edition Credit Guide.
Prisma Cloud Reviews
Users of Prisma Cloud have shared their experiences on G2, a popular software review platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their experiences with Prisma Cloud, you can visit the G2 reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Prisma Cloud
Cloud Security Posture Management: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, ensuring compliance and reducing risks in cloud environments.
Container and Kubernetes Security: Prisma Cloud secures containerized applications, detecting vulnerabilities and protecting against threats in Kubernetes deployments.
Serverless Function Security: Prisma Cloud safeguards serverless functions, monitoring and defending against potential attacks and vulnerabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Prisma Cloud
Pros:
Comprehensive security coverage: Prisma Cloud offers end-to-end protection for cloud environments, containerized applications, and serverless functions, ensuring a robust security posture.
Automated compliance checks: Prisma Cloud identifies and remediates misconfigurations, streamlining adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements in cloud environments.
User-friendly platform: Prisma Cloud's intuitive interface and clear documentation make it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Cons:
Pricing transparency: Prisma Cloud's credit-based pricing model and module bundles may be confusing for potential customers, requiring further research or consultation.
Learning curve: Users may need time to familiarize themselves with Prisma Cloud's features and capabilities, especially those new to cloud security.
Integration limitations: While Prisma Cloud supports many popular tools and platforms, organizations using less common or custom applications may face integration challenges.
Prisma Cloud compared to Forcepoint ONE
Security Focus: Forcepoint ONE simplifies security for hybrid workforces by providing secure access to web, cloud, and private apps, while Prisma Cloud is a Code to Cloud security platform that secures applications from design to runtime, prioritizing and eliminating risks across various stages.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides identity-based access control, Zero Trust web access, and consistent visibility for compliance, whereas Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security features such as Code Security, Infrastructure Security, Runtime Security, and AI Security Posture Management.
Target Audience: Forcepoint ONE is tailored for hybrid workforces, aiming to protect data and secure access anywhere, while Prisma Cloud caters to businesses and organizations looking to protect their cloud and application infrastructure throughout the entire application lifecycle.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By embracing the modern work landscape, Twingate empowers organizations to maintain secure access, enhance productivity, and reduce risks.
Solutions
Solutions
The VPN replacement your workforce will love.
Solutions