The Best 5 Alternatives to Foxpass (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Foxpass is a cloud-based solution that provides advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, primarily targeting IT and engineering teams. It offers features such as certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management. Foxpass integrates with existing systems like G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, ensuring security, reliability, and ease of use.
Foxpass Pricing
Specific pricing information for Foxpass isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit the Foxpass website to explore their offerings and potentially contact them for a quote and demo.
Foxpass's Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Foxpass on G2, highlighting its ease of use, integration capabilities, and reliable access control features. While we cannot provide an overall rating out of 5 due to the security verification page, you can visit the G2 Foxpass reviews page to explore user feedback and ratings in detail.
5 Alternatives to Foxpass
1. Cyberark
CyberArk delivers a comprehensive identity security platform, focusing on intelligent privilege controls, secure access for all identities, and flexible identity automation. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, CyberArk caters to organizations of all sizes, targeting IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Cyberark Pricing
While specific pricing information for CyberArk's products and services is not publicly available, you can explore their How to Buy page for details on evaluating, purchasing, and renewing their Identity Security solutions.
Cyberark Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager on G2, discussing its robust security features, ease of integration, and overall effectiveness in managing privileged access. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 CyberArk Privileged Access Manager reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Cyberark
Privileged Access Management: CyberArk secures access to critical systems, preventing unauthorized users from gaining control over sensitive data and infrastructure.
Endpoint Security: CyberArk's Endpoint Privilege Manager protects workstations and servers, minimizing risks from malware and insider threats.
Application Security: CyberArk safeguards applications by managing and securing secrets, ensuring only authorized applications can access sensitive information.
3 Pros and Cons of Cyberark
Pros:
Robust security features, including privileged access management, endpoint security, and application security, provide comprehensive protection.
Flexible and scalable solutions cater to organizations of all sizes, ensuring a tailored approach to identity security.
Integrates seamlessly with existing systems, simplifying deployment and management for IT administrators and security professionals.
Cons:
Some users on G2 report a steep learning curve, potentially impacting initial adoption and setup.
Lack of transparent pricing information may make it difficult for potential customers to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CyberArk's solutions.
Occasional performance issues and complex configurations may require additional support and troubleshooting efforts.
Cyberark compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and CyberArk, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while CyberArk offers a comprehensive identity security platform, catering to a broader range of users, including IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Foxpass emphasizes certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas CyberArk provides a wider range of features, such as privileged access management, endpoint security, application security, and cloud security.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while CyberArk offers a more extensive list of integrations, including workforce and customer access, secrets management, and identity management.
2. Teleport
Teleport is a secure infrastructure access platform designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Teleport aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from identity attacks while meeting compliance requirements.
Teleport Pricing
Teleport offers an Enterprise plan with cloud and self-hosted options, including advanced security and compliance features. For pricing details, contact sales or visit their pricing page.
Teleport Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Teleport, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Teleport customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Teleport
Securing Remote Access: Teleport enables secure access to infrastructure, reducing risks associated with VPNs and simplifying remote work for engineers.
Meeting Compliance Requirements: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations adhere to industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Streamlining Kubernetes Access: Teleport provides a unified access plane for Kubernetes clusters, simplifying management and enhancing security for DevOps teams.
3 Pros and Cons of Teleport
Pros:
Unified Access Plane: Teleport streamlines access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, simplifying management and enhancing security.
Compliance and Auditing: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Flexible Deployment: Teleport offers both cloud and self-hosted options, catering to various organizational needs and preferences.
Cons:
Limited Pricing Transparency: Teleport's Enterprise plan pricing is not publicly available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for details.
Targeted Audience: Teleport primarily focuses on modern engineering and security teams, which may limit its appeal to a broader range of users.
Learning Curve: New users may experience a learning curve when adopting Teleport, potentially impacting initial setup and adoption.
Teleport compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Teleport, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Teleport is designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Teleport offers a unified access plane for servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, streamlining management and enhancing security.
Teleport emphasizes compliance and auditing features, helping organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight compliance as a core feature.
3. Sailpoint
SailPoint is an AI-enabled SaaS platform that provides intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions for modern enterprises. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, SailPoint caters to organizations of all sizes, helping manage and secure real-time access to critical data and applications across the enterprise.
Sailpoint Pricing
SailPoint's pricing model is per user, with a starting price of $75,000 per user. For more pricing details, it is suggested to contact the vendor directly. Visit their website for more information.
Sailpoint Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with SailPoint on G2, discussing its AI-enabled features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in managing and securing access to critical data and applications. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 SailPoint reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Sailpoint
Identity Governance: SailPoint streamlines user access management, ensuring appropriate permissions and reducing security risks across the enterprise.
Password Management: SailPoint simplifies password management, enhancing security and user experience with self-service password reset capabilities.
Compliance Reporting: SailPoint automates compliance reporting, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and maintain security standards.
3 Pros and Cons of Sailpoint
Pros:
AI-Enabled Features: SailPoint's intelligent, autonomous platform streamlines identity governance, password management, and compliance reporting.
User-Friendly Interface: SailPoint's intuitive design simplifies access management, catering to users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalability: SailPoint's extensible solutions accommodate organizations of all sizes, ensuring tailored identity security for diverse enterprise needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: SailPoint's per-user pricing model may be unclear, requiring potential customers to contact the vendor for detailed information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Sailpoint compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and SailPoint, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while SailPoint offers a comprehensive, AI-enabled identity security platform for modern enterprises, managing and securing access to critical data and applications.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas SailPoint delivers intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions, including unified access control for all data, applications, systems, and cloud resources.
SailPoint emphasizes the use of machine learning and advanced AI for instant insights and streamlined identity processes, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight AI-enabled features in its access control offerings.
4. BeyondTrust
BeyondTrust is an identity and access security solution that helps organizations protect their IT infrastructure from identity-based threats. Offering privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, BeyondTrust focuses on user-friendliness and scalability, catering to businesses of all sizes.
BeyondTrust Pricing
For BeyondTrust pricing details, visit their Remote Support pricing page and contact their sales team for custom quotes.
BeyondTrust Reviews
Option Four: Twingate
Twingate is a secure access solution that provides private resource access for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model. Designed for simplicity and ease of use, Twingate aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, a $5 per user per month Business plan, and custom pricing for Enterprise plans. For more pricing details, visit their pricing page.
Zero Trust Networking: Twingate's zero trust model ensures secure access to private resources, reducing the attack surface and protecting sensitive data.
Remote Access: Twingate enables secure remote access to private resources, simplifying remote work for employees and enhancing productivity.
Easy Integration: Twingate integrates with existing infrastructure and identity providers, streamlining deployment and management for IT teams.
Pros:
Simple and User-Friendly: Twingate's intuitive design and ease of use make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Flexible Pricing: Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, catering to businesses of all sizes and budgets.
Secure Remote Access: Twingate's zero trust model and remote access capabilities help protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Cons:
Targeted Audience: Twingate primarily focuses on distributed workforces, which may limit its appeal to organizations with different access control needs.
Feature Set: Twingate's feature set may not be as comprehensive as some competitors, potentially impacting its suitability for organizations with more complex security requirements.
Support: Some users may require additional support during initial setup and deployment, potentially impacting adoption and satisfaction.
When comparing Foxpass and Twingate, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Twingate provides secure access to private resources for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model.
Foxpass offers certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Twingate emphasizes zero trust networking, remote access, and easy integration with existing infrastructure and identity providers.
Twingate's flexible pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, cater to businesses of all sizes and budgets, while Foxpass does not provide specific pricing information on the provided link.
Top 3 Use Cases of BeyondTrust
Privileged Access Management: Securely manage privileged credentials, preventing unauthorized access to critical systems and sensitive data.
Endpoint Privilege Management: Control user privileges on workstations and servers, reducing risks from malware and insider threats.
Secure Remote Support: Provide IT support teams with secure, efficient remote access to devices, ensuring quick issue resolution and user satisfaction.
3 Pros and Cons of BeyondTrust
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Features: BeyondTrust offers privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, providing robust protection.
User-Friendly Interface: The intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: BeyondTrust caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: BeyondTrust's pricing details are not readily available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for custom quotes.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
BeyondTrust compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and BeyondTrust, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while BeyondTrust offers a broader range of identity and access security solutions, including privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas BeyondTrust delivers cross-domain visibility of identities, identity risk pathway discovery, and identity attack surface reduction, among other features.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while BeyondTrust boasts a partner ecosystem of hundreds of leading technology vendors and integrators to enhance the security investments of their customers.
5. Delinea
Delinea is a privileged access management and identity security solution designed to help organizations secure their privileged accounts and identities. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Delinea offers products for securing credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection, catering to IT professionals, cybersecurity managers, and DevOps teams.
Delinea Pricing
Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available; users must request a quote to receive information on their privileged access management solutions.
Delinea Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Delinea on G2, discussing its privileged access management features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in securing privileged accounts and identities. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 Delinea reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Delinea
Securing Privileged Credentials: Delinea protects sensitive account passwords, ensuring only authorized users can access critical systems and data.
Streamlining Remote Access: Delinea enables secure, controlled remote access to IT infrastructure, simplifying management for IT professionals.
Automating Password Rotation: Delinea's automated password rotation feature reduces the risk of unauthorized access and strengthens overall security.
3 Pros and Cons of Delinea
Pros:
Comprehensive Privileged Access Management: Delinea offers robust features for securing privileged credentials, streamlining remote access, and automating password rotation.
User-Friendly Interface: Delinea's intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: Delinea caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available, requiring potential customers to request a quote for information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Delinea compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Delinea, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Delinea offers a broader range of privileged access management and identity security solutions for various industries and roles.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Delinea delivers features such as secure credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection.
While Foxpass integrates with tools like Active Directory and Okta, Delinea offers a more comprehensive set of use cases, catering to audit and compliance, incident response, IT complexity, remote workforce, service account management, and zero trust/least privilege scenarios.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By simplifying remote access and integrating seamlessly with existing infrastructure, Twingate enhances productivity while maintaining a secure and modern work environment.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Foxpass (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Foxpass is a cloud-based solution that provides advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, primarily targeting IT and engineering teams. It offers features such as certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management. Foxpass integrates with existing systems like G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, ensuring security, reliability, and ease of use.
Foxpass Pricing
Specific pricing information for Foxpass isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit the Foxpass website to explore their offerings and potentially contact them for a quote and demo.
Foxpass's Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Foxpass on G2, highlighting its ease of use, integration capabilities, and reliable access control features. While we cannot provide an overall rating out of 5 due to the security verification page, you can visit the G2 Foxpass reviews page to explore user feedback and ratings in detail.
5 Alternatives to Foxpass
1. Cyberark
CyberArk delivers a comprehensive identity security platform, focusing on intelligent privilege controls, secure access for all identities, and flexible identity automation. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, CyberArk caters to organizations of all sizes, targeting IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Cyberark Pricing
While specific pricing information for CyberArk's products and services is not publicly available, you can explore their How to Buy page for details on evaluating, purchasing, and renewing their Identity Security solutions.
Cyberark Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager on G2, discussing its robust security features, ease of integration, and overall effectiveness in managing privileged access. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 CyberArk Privileged Access Manager reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Cyberark
Privileged Access Management: CyberArk secures access to critical systems, preventing unauthorized users from gaining control over sensitive data and infrastructure.
Endpoint Security: CyberArk's Endpoint Privilege Manager protects workstations and servers, minimizing risks from malware and insider threats.
Application Security: CyberArk safeguards applications by managing and securing secrets, ensuring only authorized applications can access sensitive information.
3 Pros and Cons of Cyberark
Pros:
Robust security features, including privileged access management, endpoint security, and application security, provide comprehensive protection.
Flexible and scalable solutions cater to organizations of all sizes, ensuring a tailored approach to identity security.
Integrates seamlessly with existing systems, simplifying deployment and management for IT administrators and security professionals.
Cons:
Some users on G2 report a steep learning curve, potentially impacting initial adoption and setup.
Lack of transparent pricing information may make it difficult for potential customers to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CyberArk's solutions.
Occasional performance issues and complex configurations may require additional support and troubleshooting efforts.
Cyberark compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and CyberArk, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while CyberArk offers a comprehensive identity security platform, catering to a broader range of users, including IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Foxpass emphasizes certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas CyberArk provides a wider range of features, such as privileged access management, endpoint security, application security, and cloud security.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while CyberArk offers a more extensive list of integrations, including workforce and customer access, secrets management, and identity management.
2. Teleport
Teleport is a secure infrastructure access platform designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Teleport aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from identity attacks while meeting compliance requirements.
Teleport Pricing
Teleport offers an Enterprise plan with cloud and self-hosted options, including advanced security and compliance features. For pricing details, contact sales or visit their pricing page.
Teleport Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Teleport, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Teleport customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Teleport
Securing Remote Access: Teleport enables secure access to infrastructure, reducing risks associated with VPNs and simplifying remote work for engineers.
Meeting Compliance Requirements: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations adhere to industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Streamlining Kubernetes Access: Teleport provides a unified access plane for Kubernetes clusters, simplifying management and enhancing security for DevOps teams.
3 Pros and Cons of Teleport
Pros:
Unified Access Plane: Teleport streamlines access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, simplifying management and enhancing security.
Compliance and Auditing: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Flexible Deployment: Teleport offers both cloud and self-hosted options, catering to various organizational needs and preferences.
Cons:
Limited Pricing Transparency: Teleport's Enterprise plan pricing is not publicly available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for details.
Targeted Audience: Teleport primarily focuses on modern engineering and security teams, which may limit its appeal to a broader range of users.
Learning Curve: New users may experience a learning curve when adopting Teleport, potentially impacting initial setup and adoption.
Teleport compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Teleport, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Teleport is designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Teleport offers a unified access plane for servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, streamlining management and enhancing security.
Teleport emphasizes compliance and auditing features, helping organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight compliance as a core feature.
3. Sailpoint
SailPoint is an AI-enabled SaaS platform that provides intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions for modern enterprises. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, SailPoint caters to organizations of all sizes, helping manage and secure real-time access to critical data and applications across the enterprise.
Sailpoint Pricing
SailPoint's pricing model is per user, with a starting price of $75,000 per user. For more pricing details, it is suggested to contact the vendor directly. Visit their website for more information.
Sailpoint Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with SailPoint on G2, discussing its AI-enabled features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in managing and securing access to critical data and applications. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 SailPoint reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Sailpoint
Identity Governance: SailPoint streamlines user access management, ensuring appropriate permissions and reducing security risks across the enterprise.
Password Management: SailPoint simplifies password management, enhancing security and user experience with self-service password reset capabilities.
Compliance Reporting: SailPoint automates compliance reporting, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and maintain security standards.
3 Pros and Cons of Sailpoint
Pros:
AI-Enabled Features: SailPoint's intelligent, autonomous platform streamlines identity governance, password management, and compliance reporting.
User-Friendly Interface: SailPoint's intuitive design simplifies access management, catering to users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalability: SailPoint's extensible solutions accommodate organizations of all sizes, ensuring tailored identity security for diverse enterprise needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: SailPoint's per-user pricing model may be unclear, requiring potential customers to contact the vendor for detailed information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Sailpoint compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and SailPoint, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while SailPoint offers a comprehensive, AI-enabled identity security platform for modern enterprises, managing and securing access to critical data and applications.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas SailPoint delivers intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions, including unified access control for all data, applications, systems, and cloud resources.
SailPoint emphasizes the use of machine learning and advanced AI for instant insights and streamlined identity processes, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight AI-enabled features in its access control offerings.
4. BeyondTrust
BeyondTrust is an identity and access security solution that helps organizations protect their IT infrastructure from identity-based threats. Offering privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, BeyondTrust focuses on user-friendliness and scalability, catering to businesses of all sizes.
BeyondTrust Pricing
For BeyondTrust pricing details, visit their Remote Support pricing page and contact their sales team for custom quotes.
BeyondTrust Reviews
Option Four: Twingate
Twingate is a secure access solution that provides private resource access for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model. Designed for simplicity and ease of use, Twingate aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, a $5 per user per month Business plan, and custom pricing for Enterprise plans. For more pricing details, visit their pricing page.
Zero Trust Networking: Twingate's zero trust model ensures secure access to private resources, reducing the attack surface and protecting sensitive data.
Remote Access: Twingate enables secure remote access to private resources, simplifying remote work for employees and enhancing productivity.
Easy Integration: Twingate integrates with existing infrastructure and identity providers, streamlining deployment and management for IT teams.
Pros:
Simple and User-Friendly: Twingate's intuitive design and ease of use make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Flexible Pricing: Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, catering to businesses of all sizes and budgets.
Secure Remote Access: Twingate's zero trust model and remote access capabilities help protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Cons:
Targeted Audience: Twingate primarily focuses on distributed workforces, which may limit its appeal to organizations with different access control needs.
Feature Set: Twingate's feature set may not be as comprehensive as some competitors, potentially impacting its suitability for organizations with more complex security requirements.
Support: Some users may require additional support during initial setup and deployment, potentially impacting adoption and satisfaction.
When comparing Foxpass and Twingate, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Twingate provides secure access to private resources for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model.
Foxpass offers certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Twingate emphasizes zero trust networking, remote access, and easy integration with existing infrastructure and identity providers.
Twingate's flexible pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, cater to businesses of all sizes and budgets, while Foxpass does not provide specific pricing information on the provided link.
Top 3 Use Cases of BeyondTrust
Privileged Access Management: Securely manage privileged credentials, preventing unauthorized access to critical systems and sensitive data.
Endpoint Privilege Management: Control user privileges on workstations and servers, reducing risks from malware and insider threats.
Secure Remote Support: Provide IT support teams with secure, efficient remote access to devices, ensuring quick issue resolution and user satisfaction.
3 Pros and Cons of BeyondTrust
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Features: BeyondTrust offers privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, providing robust protection.
User-Friendly Interface: The intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: BeyondTrust caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: BeyondTrust's pricing details are not readily available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for custom quotes.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
BeyondTrust compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and BeyondTrust, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while BeyondTrust offers a broader range of identity and access security solutions, including privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas BeyondTrust delivers cross-domain visibility of identities, identity risk pathway discovery, and identity attack surface reduction, among other features.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while BeyondTrust boasts a partner ecosystem of hundreds of leading technology vendors and integrators to enhance the security investments of their customers.
5. Delinea
Delinea is a privileged access management and identity security solution designed to help organizations secure their privileged accounts and identities. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Delinea offers products for securing credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection, catering to IT professionals, cybersecurity managers, and DevOps teams.
Delinea Pricing
Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available; users must request a quote to receive information on their privileged access management solutions.
Delinea Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Delinea on G2, discussing its privileged access management features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in securing privileged accounts and identities. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 Delinea reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Delinea
Securing Privileged Credentials: Delinea protects sensitive account passwords, ensuring only authorized users can access critical systems and data.
Streamlining Remote Access: Delinea enables secure, controlled remote access to IT infrastructure, simplifying management for IT professionals.
Automating Password Rotation: Delinea's automated password rotation feature reduces the risk of unauthorized access and strengthens overall security.
3 Pros and Cons of Delinea
Pros:
Comprehensive Privileged Access Management: Delinea offers robust features for securing privileged credentials, streamlining remote access, and automating password rotation.
User-Friendly Interface: Delinea's intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: Delinea caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available, requiring potential customers to request a quote for information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Delinea compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Delinea, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Delinea offers a broader range of privileged access management and identity security solutions for various industries and roles.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Delinea delivers features such as secure credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection.
While Foxpass integrates with tools like Active Directory and Okta, Delinea offers a more comprehensive set of use cases, catering to audit and compliance, incident response, IT complexity, remote workforce, service account management, and zero trust/least privilege scenarios.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By simplifying remote access and integrating seamlessly with existing infrastructure, Twingate enhances productivity while maintaining a secure and modern work environment.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Foxpass (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Foxpass is a cloud-based solution that provides advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, primarily targeting IT and engineering teams. It offers features such as certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management. Foxpass integrates with existing systems like G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, ensuring security, reliability, and ease of use.
Foxpass Pricing
Specific pricing information for Foxpass isn't currently publicly available on the provided link. However, you can visit the Foxpass website to explore their offerings and potentially contact them for a quote and demo.
Foxpass's Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Foxpass on G2, highlighting its ease of use, integration capabilities, and reliable access control features. While we cannot provide an overall rating out of 5 due to the security verification page, you can visit the G2 Foxpass reviews page to explore user feedback and ratings in detail.
5 Alternatives to Foxpass
1. Cyberark
CyberArk delivers a comprehensive identity security platform, focusing on intelligent privilege controls, secure access for all identities, and flexible identity automation. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, CyberArk caters to organizations of all sizes, targeting IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Cyberark Pricing
While specific pricing information for CyberArk's products and services is not publicly available, you can explore their How to Buy page for details on evaluating, purchasing, and renewing their Identity Security solutions.
Cyberark Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager on G2, discussing its robust security features, ease of integration, and overall effectiveness in managing privileged access. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 CyberArk Privileged Access Manager reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Cyberark
Privileged Access Management: CyberArk secures access to critical systems, preventing unauthorized users from gaining control over sensitive data and infrastructure.
Endpoint Security: CyberArk's Endpoint Privilege Manager protects workstations and servers, minimizing risks from malware and insider threats.
Application Security: CyberArk safeguards applications by managing and securing secrets, ensuring only authorized applications can access sensitive information.
3 Pros and Cons of Cyberark
Pros:
Robust security features, including privileged access management, endpoint security, and application security, provide comprehensive protection.
Flexible and scalable solutions cater to organizations of all sizes, ensuring a tailored approach to identity security.
Integrates seamlessly with existing systems, simplifying deployment and management for IT administrators and security professionals.
Cons:
Some users on G2 report a steep learning curve, potentially impacting initial adoption and setup.
Lack of transparent pricing information may make it difficult for potential customers to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CyberArk's solutions.
Occasional performance issues and complex configurations may require additional support and troubleshooting efforts.
Cyberark compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and CyberArk, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while CyberArk offers a comprehensive identity security platform, catering to a broader range of users, including IT administrators, developers, and security professionals.
Foxpass emphasizes certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas CyberArk provides a wider range of features, such as privileged access management, endpoint security, application security, and cloud security.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while CyberArk offers a more extensive list of integrations, including workforce and customer access, secrets management, and identity management.
2. Teleport
Teleport is a secure infrastructure access platform designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Teleport aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from identity attacks while meeting compliance requirements.
Teleport Pricing
Teleport offers an Enterprise plan with cloud and self-hosted options, including advanced security and compliance features. For pricing details, contact sales or visit their pricing page.
Teleport Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Teleport, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Teleport customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
Top 3 Use Cases of Teleport
Securing Remote Access: Teleport enables secure access to infrastructure, reducing risks associated with VPNs and simplifying remote work for engineers.
Meeting Compliance Requirements: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations adhere to industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Streamlining Kubernetes Access: Teleport provides a unified access plane for Kubernetes clusters, simplifying management and enhancing security for DevOps teams.
3 Pros and Cons of Teleport
Pros:
Unified Access Plane: Teleport streamlines access to servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, simplifying management and enhancing security.
Compliance and Auditing: Teleport's audit logging and session recording features help organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards.
Flexible Deployment: Teleport offers both cloud and self-hosted options, catering to various organizational needs and preferences.
Cons:
Limited Pricing Transparency: Teleport's Enterprise plan pricing is not publicly available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for details.
Targeted Audience: Teleport primarily focuses on modern engineering and security teams, which may limit its appeal to a broader range of users.
Learning Curve: New users may experience a learning curve when adopting Teleport, potentially impacting initial setup and adoption.
Teleport compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Teleport, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Teleport is designed for modern engineering and security teams, offering cryptographic identity, zero trust access, and policy governance.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Teleport offers a unified access plane for servers, Kubernetes clusters, and applications, streamlining management and enhancing security.
Teleport emphasizes compliance and auditing features, helping organizations meet industry regulations and maintain security standards, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight compliance as a core feature.
3. Sailpoint
SailPoint is an AI-enabled SaaS platform that provides intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions for modern enterprises. Designed for user-friendliness and scalability, SailPoint caters to organizations of all sizes, helping manage and secure real-time access to critical data and applications across the enterprise.
Sailpoint Pricing
SailPoint's pricing model is per user, with a starting price of $75,000 per user. For more pricing details, it is suggested to contact the vendor directly. Visit their website for more information.
Sailpoint Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with SailPoint on G2, discussing its AI-enabled features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in managing and securing access to critical data and applications. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 SailPoint reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Sailpoint
Identity Governance: SailPoint streamlines user access management, ensuring appropriate permissions and reducing security risks across the enterprise.
Password Management: SailPoint simplifies password management, enhancing security and user experience with self-service password reset capabilities.
Compliance Reporting: SailPoint automates compliance reporting, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and maintain security standards.
3 Pros and Cons of Sailpoint
Pros:
AI-Enabled Features: SailPoint's intelligent, autonomous platform streamlines identity governance, password management, and compliance reporting.
User-Friendly Interface: SailPoint's intuitive design simplifies access management, catering to users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalability: SailPoint's extensible solutions accommodate organizations of all sizes, ensuring tailored identity security for diverse enterprise needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: SailPoint's per-user pricing model may be unclear, requiring potential customers to contact the vendor for detailed information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Sailpoint compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and SailPoint, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while SailPoint offers a comprehensive, AI-enabled identity security platform for modern enterprises, managing and securing access to critical data and applications.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas SailPoint delivers intelligent, autonomous, and extensible identity security solutions, including unified access control for all data, applications, systems, and cloud resources.
SailPoint emphasizes the use of machine learning and advanced AI for instant insights and streamlined identity processes, while Foxpass does not specifically highlight AI-enabled features in its access control offerings.
4. BeyondTrust
BeyondTrust is an identity and access security solution that helps organizations protect their IT infrastructure from identity-based threats. Offering privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, BeyondTrust focuses on user-friendliness and scalability, catering to businesses of all sizes.
BeyondTrust Pricing
For BeyondTrust pricing details, visit their Remote Support pricing page and contact their sales team for custom quotes.
BeyondTrust Reviews
Option Four: Twingate
Twingate is a secure access solution that provides private resource access for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model. Designed for simplicity and ease of use, Twingate aims to enhance productivity and protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, a $5 per user per month Business plan, and custom pricing for Enterprise plans. For more pricing details, visit their pricing page.
Zero Trust Networking: Twingate's zero trust model ensures secure access to private resources, reducing the attack surface and protecting sensitive data.
Remote Access: Twingate enables secure remote access to private resources, simplifying remote work for employees and enhancing productivity.
Easy Integration: Twingate integrates with existing infrastructure and identity providers, streamlining deployment and management for IT teams.
Pros:
Simple and User-Friendly: Twingate's intuitive design and ease of use make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Flexible Pricing: Twingate offers a range of pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, catering to businesses of all sizes and budgets.
Secure Remote Access: Twingate's zero trust model and remote access capabilities help protect organizations from security threats while maintaining a seamless user experience.
Cons:
Targeted Audience: Twingate primarily focuses on distributed workforces, which may limit its appeal to organizations with different access control needs.
Feature Set: Twingate's feature set may not be as comprehensive as some competitors, potentially impacting its suitability for organizations with more complex security requirements.
Support: Some users may require additional support during initial setup and deployment, potentially impacting adoption and satisfaction.
When comparing Foxpass and Twingate, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Twingate provides secure access to private resources for distributed workforces under a zero trust networking model.
Foxpass offers certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Twingate emphasizes zero trust networking, remote access, and easy integration with existing infrastructure and identity providers.
Twingate's flexible pricing plans, including a free Starter plan, cater to businesses of all sizes and budgets, while Foxpass does not provide specific pricing information on the provided link.
Top 3 Use Cases of BeyondTrust
Privileged Access Management: Securely manage privileged credentials, preventing unauthorized access to critical systems and sensitive data.
Endpoint Privilege Management: Control user privileges on workstations and servers, reducing risks from malware and insider threats.
Secure Remote Support: Provide IT support teams with secure, efficient remote access to devices, ensuring quick issue resolution and user satisfaction.
3 Pros and Cons of BeyondTrust
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Features: BeyondTrust offers privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment, providing robust protection.
User-Friendly Interface: The intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: BeyondTrust caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: BeyondTrust's pricing details are not readily available, requiring potential customers to contact sales for custom quotes.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
BeyondTrust compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and BeyondTrust, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while BeyondTrust offers a broader range of identity and access security solutions, including privileged access management, endpoint privilege management, and operational technology cybersecurity assessment.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas BeyondTrust delivers cross-domain visibility of identities, identity risk pathway discovery, and identity attack surface reduction, among other features.
While both solutions integrate with existing systems, Foxpass specifically integrates with G Suite, Office365, Okta, and OneLogin, while BeyondTrust boasts a partner ecosystem of hundreds of leading technology vendors and integrators to enhance the security investments of their customers.
5. Delinea
Delinea is a privileged access management and identity security solution designed to help organizations secure their privileged accounts and identities. With a focus on ease of use and scalability, Delinea offers products for securing credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection, catering to IT professionals, cybersecurity managers, and DevOps teams.
Delinea Pricing
Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available; users must request a quote to receive information on their privileged access management solutions.
Delinea Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Delinea on G2, discussing its privileged access management features, ease of use, and overall effectiveness in securing privileged accounts and identities. To explore user feedback and ratings in detail, visit the G2 Delinea reviews page.
Top 3 Use Cases of Delinea
Securing Privileged Credentials: Delinea protects sensitive account passwords, ensuring only authorized users can access critical systems and data.
Streamlining Remote Access: Delinea enables secure, controlled remote access to IT infrastructure, simplifying management for IT professionals.
Automating Password Rotation: Delinea's automated password rotation feature reduces the risk of unauthorized access and strengthens overall security.
3 Pros and Cons of Delinea
Pros:
Comprehensive Privileged Access Management: Delinea offers robust features for securing privileged credentials, streamlining remote access, and automating password rotation.
User-Friendly Interface: Delinea's intuitive design simplifies navigation and usage, making it accessible for users with varying levels of data security expertise.
Scalable Solution: Delinea caters to businesses of all sizes, ensuring tailored security measures for diverse organizational needs.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Delinea's pricing details are not publicly available, requiring potential customers to request a quote for information.
Initial Setup Complexity: Some users on G2 report challenges during initial setup, potentially impacting adoption and deployment.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned occasional delays in receiving support, which may affect issue resolution and overall satisfaction.
Delinea compared to Foxpass
When comparing Foxpass and Delinea, there are several key differences that set them apart:
Foxpass primarily focuses on advanced access control for Wi-Fi and server access, targeting IT and engineering teams, while Delinea offers a broader range of privileged access management and identity security solutions for various industries and roles.
Foxpass provides certificate-based Wi-Fi access control, standard Wi-Fi access control, and Linux server access management, whereas Delinea delivers features such as secure credentials, privileged remote access, privilege and entitlement elevation, and identity protection.
While Foxpass integrates with tools like Active Directory and Okta, Delinea offers a more comprehensive set of use cases, catering to audit and compliance, incident response, IT complexity, remote workforce, service account management, and zero trust/least privilege scenarios.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, enabling companies to safeguard private resources and internet traffic with Zero Trust security tools. By simplifying remote access and integrating seamlessly with existing infrastructure, Twingate enhances productivity while maintaining a secure and modern work environment.
Solutions
Solutions
The VPN replacement your workforce will love.
Solutions